Why Are the Anglo Behind Today's Neo-Nazi Movements?

My Reactionary Politics

Anonymous commenters under my TikTok videos frequently recommend that I should watch a documentary titled Europa: The Last Battle. It’s propaganda. I saw the first hour of this 12-hear film many years ago. And I dismissed it as unhelpful. Is it trying to manifest that Europeans should have their “last battle” before they are wiped out?

On an emotional level, I have never supported Neo-Nazism, though I can appreciate the Third Reich’s art and architecture, especially its films such as The Prodigal Son (Der Verlorene Sohn) featuring Luis Trenker. Aside from the aesthetics, why would anyone alive today want to LARP (live-action role-play) as a member of an extinct German political movement? Or as a Roman soldier?

For some reason, Ukraine’s Bandera nationalists and their Azov battalions have adopted Nazi symbolism. But they were founded and funded by a Jewish billionaire named Igor Kolomoyskiy. Before his death, Russia had its Navalny. Navalny was a Neo-Nazi who rallied against Putin’s pro-Islam and pro-immigration policies. Navalny supported by the British MI6.

And then came the U.S.-based swastika-bearing Blood Tribe, along with less overtly nazist groups such as the Patriot Front, or the many offshoots of the Active Club Network. All of these groups come off as childishly silly, as though their outfits were designed by the CIA’s diversity intern without a feel for European emotion.

Moreover, lacking any valid emotional reason for a revival of Nazi optics, and especially so in the USA, I could not grasp why these Nazi revivalist movements were popping up left and right. And that’s because they are the artificial, intellectual constructs of the Western secret services, notably the CIA,MI6, and NATO’s military intel.

They’re fake. They’re setting up fake Nazi and right-wing clubs to lure in susceptible white men to kill them off in the war against Russia. In fact, this is part of what I believe is going to be the—attempted— genocide of white people. By getting the men of the West hot for another hot war on Russia, just as they did during World War I and World War II.

My interpretation of the World Wars, ignoring massive Hollywood propaganda, is that they were fake wars meant to purposefully purge tens of millions of white men on both sides of the frontline. Namely, to later replace us with Semitic (Arab, Islamic) immigrants. Bait and bleed!

Personally, for a long time, I didn’t know what to do with the Nazi sympathizers within the right-wing movements. I didn’t know the right words to describe my own politics either. But I’m confident know that I am a reactionary conservative who supports ethno-nationalist policies on a religious basis.

And I’m confident now that Adolf Hitler was indeed a British plant, trained by the Anglo secret services to convince the Germans to go to war with Russia. Come to think of it, Nazism or national-socialism, as per the Horst-Wessel song, rejected both the Reds (Marxist communists) and the Reaction (pro-monarchist conservatives). National-socialism perhaps was just a codeword for globalism.

The Germans were fighting for globalism though not for their own survival. They weren’t fighting for Germany but for the globalist, mercantilist interest of the British Empire. Germany’s industry had become a threat to the British power base. If Germans, for example, were able to produce a synthetic rubber both better and cheaper than the product the British merchants were importing from around the world, German ingenuity might someday kill British power.

So, Germany and its people had to be destroyed. That’s also the incentive behind mass Islamic immigration into Europe: to dumb down the mainland European populations to the point they cannot possibly pose a threat to mercantilist interests. A society built by an average IQ=100 population cannot be conquered and maintained by an average IQ=85 immigrant population.

According to William Engdahl, in his book A Century of War, Hitler was working for the British intelligence when he stumbled upon the German Worker Party. Then, history says, Hitler (an Austrian) became a fervent German nationalist and he decided to be the Führer of the movement, changing the party’s name to the National-Socialist German Worker Party. Or perhaps the Globalist German Worker Party?

I have read Mein Kampf twice, once in German and once in English, and my impression was always that Hitler supplied his personal backstory to another author’s political work. In fact, the editor, a Jesuit priest named Bernhard Stempfle, was the likely author of the book’s political doctrine (the main body of the work).

Mein Kampf came out in two volumes, and a third volume was never published until after Hitler’s death. But it wasn’t Hitlers first book. An earlier book published around 1923 was titled Adolf Hitler: His Life and His Speeches and was clearly meant to hype the persona of Hitler. Some say Hitler wrote it himself under a pseudonym but I, again, suspect the book and the speeches were written by Hitler’s priest Bernhard Stempfle.

I believe Stempfle, an antisemite journalist and founder of a Munich newspaper that later became the infamous Der völkische Beobachter, was also the author of most of Hitler’s speeches. Strangely, in 1937, members of the SS murdered Stempfle. And even stranger, Hitler then had these SS-men killed in retaliation.

What’s interesting about Hitler’s speeches is that he hardly ever spoke of any kind of German biological supremacy. Hitler focused almost all of his attention to the threat of the Bolshevik Jews in Soviet Russia. He spoke frequently of how Soviet atheist communism was going to become a new religion, and how it was going to replace Christianity.

Indeed, he was right. Though Hitler claimed it was going to take 300 years or so for communism to defeat Christianity, we are already living in said communist dystopia barely 80 years after 1944. Christianity, of course, was a central lynchpin of the British Empire as it sought to unite its subjugated peoples under a single doctrine.

But after the 1950s, the British soon switched to another doctrine, namely that of a rules-based globalism, and of scientific atheism. The Christianity that once supported British power now had to be abolished by militant atheists such as Richard Dawkins.

In my view, white people should indeed unite themselves under a form of Christianity that supports our ethno-nationalists interests. I.e., no longer a globalist Christianity, as it was spread under the British flag, but a faith tied to our blood.

I believe that Europeans, both in Europe and their descendants elsewhere, are in need of a reactionary movement. Let’s call it, simply, The Reaction.

The Reaction serves to beat back diversity and progress, and to beat down degeneracy and decline. We want to make our peoples physically and mentally healthy again. We want them to escape the big cities. And we want them to have large familie again so they can outbreed the leftist urbanites and their immigrants slaves.

We need a reactionary conservatism that supports our people. And I feel we can best achieve this goal by having diplomatic ties with the white Russians on our side, not by waging yet another Purge War on ourselves.