All my links » | My music »
White Europeans and their colonial descendants have always been a global minority. Depending on the definition of “white”, our people today make up about 8-12% of the global population. However, only about 2% of the global population is a fertile white woman (aged 15-40) who might still have white children.
But numbers aren’t everything. A small group of intelligent people may be able to solve problems that billions of less intelligent people never will. Around the start of the Industrial Revolution, kickstarted by the English and the Germans, Europe counted no more than 100 million inhabitants. Today, Europe feeds over 740 million people.
Around 1000 AD, Europe only fed 36 million people, less than the State of California houses today. I argue that our problems are not numerical. Though we may lose our cities to mass immigration—made possible by the very Industrial Age white people spearheaded—we will not lose ourselves. We may end up better off.
The European Industrial Age caused deep feelings of envy among the other races. All of a sudden, Europeans came to their lands looking for resources. Different people responded differently. The Asiatics began studying Western technological advances and eventually mastered the art of industry and high-tech. However, some other races of people still wallow in envious misery saying Europeans “stole everything”.
Know that one cannot reason with envy. Envious people cannot be reeducated. Their emotions override all logic. They come to Europe “to take back what was stolen” despite never having invented anything on their own. It implies that certain races of people love using finished goods but will never learn how to produce them.
Case in point: Nigeria’s discovery of $100 billion worth of lithium for batteries. Instead of investing in mining skills, the Nigerian leadership simply sold the mining contracts to an Australian firm. Perhaps such leaders know their people are lacking in certain competencies that might never be kindled by education either.
Still, Europe’s aging population cannot be maintained without bankrupting the economy. The idea that immigrants could act as the replacement children we didn’t have is also false. Immigrants are not interested in paying white pensioners their pension money. More likely, a turning point will come when old white people (who can’t run so fast) are going to be killed off in the streets in broad daylight—by the very migrants they voted in.
When we prepare now for the possibility of such atrocities later, our resolve becomes all the more clear. We must bring our young families to safety, on lands we can defend, and where we can continue to thrive. This means cutting loose from the dying urban zones but not from industry. We are not Luddites who shun technology. Rather, we will use any technology available to us to secure our existence.
First, we retreat young families from the urban zones to the suburbs, and further on to the countryside. But for a while, as in South Africa, non-white urban-centric leadership will make our lives miserable, and state-funded armies (militias) may hunt and kill our families regularly.
Next, we prepare for a “jump”. As Western industries cannot and will not be maintained by people who were never able to kickstart industry in their own countries, our people must work in secrecy to “kill the cities”. Through our control of the land, we must sabotage and starve the urban centers.
White male militiamen, guerillas, must work around the clock to both defend their people and sabotage the cities. The industrial miracle has simply attracted the bloodlust of envious people and we cannot restore the balance until we root out the source of their envy: luxury goods.
The guerilla aims to destroy the supply chains that produce luxury goods, and thereby, remove the object of foreign men’s jealousy.
Though we must have more children, numbers alone cannot lead to victory. This isn’t a numbers game. From the zombie movies we have already learned that well-armed, intelligent groups of people with the right skills may outrun a million zombies, and find safety. By keeping our numbers manageable, rather than letting our numbers swell uncontrollably, we shall be more flexible and more likely to survive.
The world is going to change for the better. We, white European types, are going to find out that it is better to have 50 million who can survive anywhere than to have 500 million who can survive nowhere at all.
This well written piece counter-signals many people in our movement who insist we have a political solution. If there is a political solution (which I don’t believe there is) then leaving cities is a losing proposition, or so they claim.
Do you see a political solution as viable if we are scattered? I do, if we scatter collectively, as odd as that sounds. I just don’t think we will in significant enough numbers to effect political change that’s steep enough to deal with our plight.