Western Military Leadership Doesn't Know How to Win Wars
The Western military leadership appears to be primarily concerned with producing profits for the war industry. In the book Conflict: The Future of War, general Petraeus writes about the wars of the future, about AI, robots, and drones, but fails to mention that diversity, immigration, climate change, and sexual sabotage are much more potent weapons.
When I speak of ‘man-made climate change’, I mean militaries actively influencing the climate as a means of waging war, for example, by causing draughts and frozen crops in the enemy’s lands. Sexual sabotage implies promoting LGBTQIA+ among the enemy’s soldiers and leadership in order to weaken the enemy from within. Clearly, we’ve been at the receiving end of such attacks.
Immigration is the obvious Trojan Horse. Stoking conflict among rivaling gangs of ethnic groups helps destabilize the enemy’s country. The world is already at war with the West. But the Western military leadership has a near-autistic focus on producing robotic tinker toys. They still think that’s how wars are supposed to be won.
I was reading Petraeus’ book when riots broke out in The Hague, The Netherlands. Rivaling gangs of Eritrean blacks set fire to cars and began attacking the arriving police forces with heavy bricks. Video footage shows a nation at war with diversity, or rather: it shows diversity at war with the whole West.
Our enemies are not waiting at our gates. They are already roaming our cities, our cinemas, shopping streets, and swimming pools. Migration puts our civilians in danger. Immigrants can be pitted against their host populations.
Question: How are we supposed to send men to the frontlines to fight Russia in Ukraine when our own neighborhoods are unsafe? Are we supposed to leave women and children behind with diversity when diversity is a powder keg waiting for a spark?
Then it struck me: men like Petraeus don’t understand wars of the future. Chinese leadership seems to understand it very well, namely that the West can be defeated with poison and sabotage. Drone wars are likely going to be a costly distraction from the real battlefield: our civilians’ mental and physical health.
As much as we like to believe in Geneva conventions and other constructs of Western gentlemanliness, the enemy isn’t targeting our drones and soldiers. The enemy is targeting our civilians at home. China doesn’t need to bomb a single U.S. city if it can sabotage Western people’s sexuality by promoting child castrations.
We are being poisoned while our top military brass are too stupid to even recognize the attacks. Our best generals are still trapped studying their diversity training manuals to help reveal their unconscious biases.
Who Will Protect the Women and Children?
Had the local Dutch police forces not been on call in The Hague to quell the riots, but had they instead been sent to the Ukrainian frontline to fight Russia, who would have been left behind to defend Europe’s women and children?
The war of the future is already being waged in our own cities. Hopes of hastily creating “diverse armies” to try to enlist the immigrants are plain imbecilic. You think Europe’s Muslims will fight Muslim Chechens? You think Europe’s blacks will fight in Russian snow? You think anti-Western immigrants will fight any wars for the West at all?
And then there’s the reality that our globalist leaders are deliberately trying to get white men to kill themselves off in wars, while diverse immigrant mercenaries take over our homelands from within. We are being genocided. Our own governments are on the side of China when it comes to wiping us out.
How are we supposed to win wars abroad when extremely violent Latino gangs are taking over American cities? Or when aggressive Africans are taking over European cities? When Russia, China, Saudis, and Iran are funding these developments? And uncle Soros and his Open Societies are welcoming the internal collapse of the West?
The Hague riots prove European nations cannot participate in any future wars abroad. Our men need to stay at home to guard their peoples.
If we cannot leave our women and children at home with diversity, then we cannot send our men away to fight wars abroad. The wars of the near future will be fought at home, amidst our civilian populations. And we will likely have to fight and win these battles without the slightest support from our anti-white governments.
Modern Warfare + Modern Boroughs
The intelligence of our military leaders becomes especially apparent when the authors of Conflict write that “robots don’t need sleep”. But they need fuel, repairs, and batteries! Who is going to refuel or recharge a robot stuck in the Moscow snow? Another robot? Who is going to repair the fuel robot when it, too, breaks down? A fuel robot repair robot?
You get the point. The U.S. War Industry was built for profit, not for victory. There’s a robot for everything until we run out of money. The focus on technology and weapons is a grave mistake. The wars of the future cannot be won with technology *alone*. Victory must first be achieved in the civilian psychological arena. Hell—Western people don’t even know what they’re fighting for!
To achieve victory for our peoples in the West, we shall have to rely less on drones being sent to faraway frontlines, and more on having a ‘borough’ infrastructure in place, at home, so that people may find adequate shelter. We need to, first and foremost, offer our civilian populations shelter from diversity and enemy drones.
A European borough (a Burcht or Burg) used to be a place where people could find safety in case enemy marauders attacked their farms. Some of these boroughs later developed into towns and cities, such as the German cities of Marburg or Freiburg. The Battle at the Teutoburg Forest implies such boroughs were already in existence over two-thousand years ago. The world Teutoburg literally means: the people’s borough.
Think of modern-day boroughs as nuclear bomb shelters but for civilians. And while they’re huddled together in such boroughs, they shall find a renewed spiritual bonding. We should use the coming war as an opportunity to instill the people with renewed religious vigor
It is my sincerest suggestion that leaders who care about white people’s survival start building networks of boroughs—with or without government support. We are going to need them to store caches of fertile people while machines and robots outside wreak havoc on the planet.
I do not, however, think the scenario of Terminator will unfold, since I don’t think AI will prove to be very intelligent, but we might get close to the scenario of Mad Max in which rivaling gangs battle to seize control of remaining food and energy supplies.
One can assume that these generals are myopic, but on the other hand ex-generals like Petraeus are so far gone into the WEF-Owner neoliberal philosophy complex that they are beholden to their über-masters first. And last. They, like so many others granted enormous success within the "Biggest Narrative" have left we the masses behind as sacrificial to their larger interests. They have long since whored themselves (and their erstwhile people) in order to belong to the private jet set.
NATO, i.e., the US warmongers and its EU allies have been busy carrying on the old Mackinder madness against the forever Bogeyman Russia. The EU is now self- immolating on two fronts, namely internally via the WEF/WHO invasion+injection+farmkill and externally via a NATO proxy war against the nation that used to supply the EU with cheap energy for its industry. The EU is done. Too stupid to recognize its real enemy. Forget the Western 'leaders'. You allowed and continue to allow invasion, you continue to be ruled by un-elected bureaucrats and you continue to inject your populations with deadly gene-editing poison and that's the short list. Time to look inward.