Where to start? How to say goodbye to 2023? I wish we could leave diversity behind and start anew. But wait, we can!
A research by Bryan Pesta et. al., published just this December 21st, confirmed what we always knew but weren’t allowed to know. Namely, that among adults living in Britain, whites and Jews outclass all others in the cognitive abilities department.
White (native) Britons average their IQs around 100, and British Jews around 108. But Pakistani rape gang members likely average around 85, African (black/Negroe) British around 87, Arabs around 88-89, Indians a bit over 90.
Also, half-white/half-black people tended to average around an IQ of 90. Only the low-IQ whites tended to mate sucesfully with black people. Note that an IQ of 90 is a mere 3 point upgrade from the black average of 87, whereas it is a 10 point drop from the white average. A heavy toll to pay. Mixing races thus cannot cure the black disability.
So much for the Indian IT experts. Indeed, Saudi-Arabian officials got a little suspicious and decided to actually test Indian immigrants’ IT skills. They found that barely 4% of the so-called experts were able to do the jobs they had applied for. The Indian CEO craze in the USA may have something to do with swaying India to side with the US in the war on China. More qualified white men have been conned out of senior positions for the sake of geopolitics.
What also stands out is the IQ of the allegedly super-intelligent Chinese people. Chinese people actually scored an average of around 98, just a bit below that of white Britons.
The results really put White people, and Jews, on top of the cognitive food chain. But Jews are a relatively small group. So let me explain it in this way: White people are the largest, most intelligent group of people on Earth. There are larger groups but they are less intelligent. There are more intelligent groups, but they are smaller in size.
In the end, Jews excel because they get to live among white people. This, perhaps, may explain the religious conflict between Protestant white people (“White Supremacists”) and Jewish Supremacists. And it explains why the smarter non-Jewish White leadership has so often resorted to driving Jews out of their societies.
To have such a large group of relatively intelligent, competent people, condemns this White race to the role of civilizers, inventers, and builders. The Chinese were able to catch up but were not the originators of the Industrial Revolution nor the inventors of electricity.
Whites simply have no rivals. Perhaps we can make our declining numbers work for us instead of against us. For example, the Chinese numbers heavily rely on the rice-based agriculture. As a side-effect, they cannot displace their people at will. They are stuck, largely, in that East-China valley, whereas white people tend to live off pastoralism and can, in fact, turn many presently uninhabited woodlands into pastures. Whites have greater flexibility in terms of habitation.
This flexibility is why whites colonized the Americas, South Africa, and Australia, after all, because we could do pastoralism there. The Chinese couldn’t have done rice cultures in North America, and the Indians couldn’t replicate their grain culture anywhere else but in India.
African blacks, even more dependent on “what gives”, remain consumed by envy, and cannot grasp the steps required to elevate themselves. They likely never will advance, at least not on their own. My impression of black people overall is that they perceive the White success advantage not as the product of innate ability, but of “theft and robbery”.
Though, do not underestimate the few high-IQ blacks. It would be safe to assume they are extremely motivated and dreaming of genetically upgrading their people in order to enact revenge on the whites. Or to dumb whites down, if they could.
Whites, alas, didn’t bother to steal African intelligence. The old-age concept of a White Man’s Burden, then, makes a ton more sense than calling it White Privilege.
Have you ever noticed how animals of various species tend to flock to humans for petting and comfort? For food and shelter? And that even polar bears, lizards, and birds seem to understand that their association with humans can win them all sorts of benefits?
That is exactly what I claim to observe when I watch so-called minorities living among whites. We benefit them, so they come to us. But they also hate us, for we “control the wealth”. Control, not generate, right? They are like children, or dare I say cattle, and will respond with anger when we don’t meet their immediate demands.
As it is with cattle, though, we cannot maintain large numbers of people for no reason. In a normal farm situation, a farmer should cull the herd he cannot productively put to use. Too many minorities living off of wealth generated by others leads to a decline in living standards among all parties.
So I’m all for a culling.
As King Charles once apparently said to Prince Harry (paraphrasing lines from his book), war is a religious experience, but a necessary experience.